Login
No account yet? Register
Not Quite Right

Video

Blast from the past

International

SfGloss
Salamanca apology after 20 years PDF Print E-mail
Tuesday, 24 June 2008
Iain Clacher

Image
Salamanca Markets in 1988. Photo: Roger Lovell
Hobart City Council has voted in favour of making a formal apology to the gay and lesbian community for the arrests of 130 people who supported a banned gay law reform stall at Salamanca Markets 20 years ago.

The council also voted to commemorate the event with a $15,000 contribution to a plaque and public art work and a $3,000 contribution toward a photographic exhibition. The council will also host a civic reception at which the apology will be delivered.

Six of the council’s 12 aldermen voted in favour of the apology.

Councillors John Freeman and Darlene Haigh voted against the apology, while two others were absent. Lord Mayor Rob Valentine did not take part in the debate as his parents run a stall at Salamanca and could be seen to have a pecuniary interest in the issue.

Freeman and Haigh, who both served on the council at the time of the arrests, continue to maintain the ban was justified.

Freeman told council the ban was “medically correct” because of HIV/AIDS, while Haigh said it would have been a “dereliction of duty” not to ban the stall as homosexuality was illegal at the time.

However, in a passionate speech Deputy Mayor Eva Ruzicka reminded council that Freeman and Haigh were not the only councillors involved in the Salamanca melee.

“I was there,” she said, “but as someone who was arrested.”

Ruzicka told Evolution Online she would “do everything possible” to convince Freeman and Haigh to take part in the conciliation process.

“I will do everything I can to convince them,” Ruzicka said. “Without them, it won’t be perfect, but then nothing is perfect.”

Chairing the debate, Ruzicka said she could have paid a high price for her arrest at Salamanca 20 years ago.  

“It was on the news. My employers found out, and my job was under threat as I was a legal secretary at the time. My partner was quite homophobic, so it was an interesting time for everyone. My mother has only recently found out about it.”

Ruzicka also spoke about the affect of the saga on council officers and police.

“Council officers underwent enormous stress. Many didn’t know how to handle it. They never understood what it was like to have people chanting at you and you had to arrest them. They were just doing what the council had ordered them to do.”

Tasmanian Gay and Lesbian Rights Group spokesperson Rodney Croome said the apology will help reconcile those who were involved in the arrests and send out a positive message about how much Tasmania has changed.

"The arrests caused deep pain on both sides, and I expect a few tears to be shed when the apology is finally given," Croome said.

"The apology will send out a positive message about Tasmania's maturity into a more inclusive society.

"It will also remind us that human rights, and human rights defenders, deserve respect, no matter how contentious the issue at stake."

Croome said he regrets that Freeman and Haigh voted against an apology, but added this will not diminish the apology's importance.

"This is not about individual councillors, but about the city as a whole making amends to those of its citizens it targeted, and those of its staff members it put in the firing line."

Ruzicka said homophobia had been “virulent” in the Tasmania of the 1980s, but that there had been much positive change in the years since.

“It’s funny little island,” Ruzicka said. “We might be tiny, we might be insular, but some of the most wonderful human rights and environmental things happen in this state.”

The official apology is due to be delivered during Human Rights Week in early December.

Comments (3)add comment
Apology
written by john , 11 August, 2008

I think I remember this happening all those years ago looking on from the mainland in victoria and now that i have moved here and settled in I can see why you have cause for concern .
Do Tasmanians accept us for who we are or are they just worried about tourism and because as a gay man it was hard for me to even guy a home here since they want to only invite straight people who are going to populate as they see it.


...
written by Rodney Croome , 05 July, 2008

When I was invited to the Hobart City Council's LGBTI Liaison Committee, on behalf of the Tas Gay & Lesbian Rights Group and those arrested at Salamanca Market, to suggest events to commemorate the 20th anniversary of those arrests, I put forward several ideas including an apology.

An apology was endorsed by the Committee, although Julian favoured an acknowledgment of past mistakes. At the next committee meeting the matter was re-visited because Julian had recorded in the minutes that the committee had supported an acknowledgment. The committee emphatically said it wanted an apology.

The apology then went to the Council's Community Development Committee which unanimously recommended it to the whole Council. That meeting is open to the media and reports soon emerged of the recommendation. I was asked if the TGLRG supported the recommendation and of course I said “yes”. To be consistent with the Liaison Committee's views, I said the apology was for all those involved, not just those arrested.

Unfortunately Julian could not accept this democratic outcome and secretly lobbied against an apology. Claiming to represent the Committee which had twice endorsed an apology Julian wrote to all Aldermen claiming that,

"It is the general opinion that we could live easily with ‘regret’ or ‘acknowledge mistakes were made in the past’."

Fortunately the Council ignored Julian and did the right thing. It is regrettable that two Aldermen dissented, but that dissent is their responsibility not mine, and it makes the apology no less important. When the apology is given it will be a significant moment in Tasmanian LGBT history, and not the “quick fix” Julian claims. I understand that Julian seeks to protect the Liaison Committee he helped establish from controversy. But the publicity the apology was bound to attract, and the intransigence shown by the two dissenting Aldermen, have not jeopardised the Committee in any way.

It is the height of hypocrisy for Julian to accuse others of not respecting proper processes when it is he who has undermined the express wishes of his Committee, and of the broader LGBT community.

The TGLRG has written to the Committee asking that Julian no longer be involved in decision-making on this issue.



...
written by Julian Punch , 26 June, 2008

The Greater Hobart Coming Out Proud Program Community Liaison Committee negotiated a settlement of the long standing angst over the arrests in Salamanca 20 years ago. This is based on three initiatives, as well as an apology. Rodney Croome was invited as an honoured visitor to be part of the negotiations.

The negotiations were based on the excellent relationship the COPP committee has with the HCC and all councillors since it was unanimously endorsed by council in 2006. They were also based on some values in a spirit of reconciliation as follows.

We share a history of discrimination, as well as being part of other diverse groups, and make progress not only through law reform, but also through cultural change strategies that acknowledge, respect and celebrate diversity in its different forms. The 20th anniversary [of the Salamanca action], as well as the 10th of the TADC, are important opportunities for us to restore self-esteem for many in our community who still experience discrimination and harassment.

While reflecting and honouring the activists involved in the great changes that resulted, any celebration should also reflect and detail the achievements of our community since then. As well to acknowledge that many in our community, especially in the regions, are still experiencing discrimination and harassment.

We should not dishonour, but respect people who took a different stand, or had as part of their employment responsibility to engage the police or prosecute those involved in the Salamanca Stand

It is important for our community to ‘have a say’ in the anniversary celebrations by way of making recommendations to council and other human rights groups as well as encouraging all GLBTI organisation to mount their celebrations. Organisations need to consult and encourage participation through wide consultation. No one group owns the past or the future.

It is unfortunate that Rodney Croome demanded early action on an apology outside the positive discussions in a sense of reconciliation that were being held with all parties. The demand resulted in an agreement that is not only acrimonious, but also not unanimous.

COPP is developing a management plan with the collaboration of the HCC that will assist many sections of the GLBTI community that are still very disadvantaged. Hopefully the ongoing angst after the 'divided decision' to give an apology will not threaten these most important initiatives and most vulnerable sections of our community 'traded off' in a quick fix apology.



Write comment
password
 

busy
 
< Prev   Next >
 

Sponsors

39